Optimal Polymer Photovoltaics

Noel M. O’Boyle, Casey M. Campbell, Geoffrey R. Hutchison. “Computational Design and Selection of Optimal Organic Photovoltaic Materials.” J. Phys. Chem. C 2011 115 (32) pp 16200–16210. Available Online (ACS). Also available through U. C. Cork. (Open Access).
Conjugated organic polymers are key building blocks of low-cost photovoltaic materials. We have examined over 90000 copolymers using computational predictions to solve the “inverse design” of molecular structures with optimum properties for highly efficient solar cells (specifically matching optical excitation energies and excited-state energies). Our approach, which uses a genetic algorithm to search the space of synthetically accessible copolymers of six or eight monomer units, yields hundreds of candidate copolymers with predicted efficiencies over 8% (the current experimental record), including many predicted to be over 10% efficient. We discuss trends in polymer sequences and motifs found in the most frequent monomers and dimers in these highly efficient targets and derive design rules for the selection of appropriate donor and acceptor molecules. We show how additional computationally intensive filtering steps can be used, for example, to eliminate targets likely to have poor hole mobilities. Our method effectively targets optimum electronic structure and optical properties far more efficiently than time-consuming serial experiments or computational studies and can be applied to similar problems in other areas of materials science.

5 thoughts on “Optimal Polymer Photovoltaics

  1. Pingback: Optimal Photovoltaic Paper on Cover of J. Phys. Chem. C | Hutchison Group

  2. Pingback: Prof. Hutchison on the Radio | Hutchison Group

  3. Pingback: Solar Cell Research Featured in Chemistry Views | Hutchison Group

  4. I noticed that your group have made full use of the theoretical calculation and computer stimulation to predict co-polymers with well performance. I think this method is crutical and necessary, through stimulation and calculation, some un-necessary experiments can be avoided, more efforts can be put into the most promising co-polymer, this is really exciting. However, a key issue is still hard to be solved by this method, morphology, which is nanoscale and unstable. some factors can influence morphology and then affect the final performance.

    • We’re keenly aware of the morphology / nanomorphology issue. Our whole “designer defect” project aims at addressing the question of charge transport through disordered organics. Stay tuned, we should have some publications on this topic soon.

Leave a Reply